Sample dataset: 200 candidates analyzed across 4 hiring stages
This demo shows a hiring process with strong compliance.
Candidates Analyzed
200
Groups Analyzed
3
Stages Analyzed
4
Total Alerts
48
Critical intersectional impact for Non-binary × Other (IR: 0.58)
Impact Ratio: 0.58
Critical intersectional impact for Male × White (IR: 0.45)
Impact Ratio: 0.45
Critical intersectional impact for Male × Other (IR: 0.44)
Impact Ratio: 0.44
Critical intersectional impact for Male × Black or African American (IR: 0.44)
Impact Ratio: 0.44
Critical intersectional impact for Female × Asian (IR: 0.44)
Impact Ratio: 0.44
Critical intersectional impact for Female × White (IR: 0.32)
Impact Ratio: 0.32
Critical intersectional impact for Female × Hispanic or Latino (IR: 0.23)
Impact Ratio: 0.23
Critical intersectional impact for Male × Hispanic or Latino (IR: 0.23)
Impact Ratio: 0.23
Critical intersectional impact for Female × Black or African American (IR: 0.00)
Impact Ratio: 0.00
Critical intersectional impact for Non-binary × Asian (IR: 0.00)
Impact Ratio: 0.00
Critical intersectional impact for Female × 45-54 (IR: 0.56)
Impact Ratio: 0.56
Critical intersectional impact for Female × 25-34 (IR: 0.52)
Impact Ratio: 0.52
Critical intersectional impact for Male × 35-44 (IR: 0.40)
Impact Ratio: 0.40
Critical intersectional impact for Male × 25-34 (IR: 0.35)
Impact Ratio: 0.35
Critical intersectional impact for Male × 55+ (IR: 0.30)
Impact Ratio: 0.30
Critical intersectional impact for Male × 18-24 (IR: 0.28)
Impact Ratio: 0.28
Critical intersectional impact for Female × 35-44 (IR: 0.26)
Impact Ratio: 0.26
Critical intersectional impact for Female × 55+ (IR: 0.21)
Impact Ratio: 0.21
Critical intersectional impact for Female × 18-24 (IR: 0.00)
Impact Ratio: 0.00
Critical intersectional impact for Non-binary × 35-44 (IR: 0.00)
Impact Ratio: 0.00
Critical intersectional impact for White × 55+ (IR: 0.56)
Impact Ratio: 0.56
Critical intersectional impact for Asian × 45-54 (IR: 0.56)
Impact Ratio: 0.56
Critical intersectional impact for Black or African American × 18-24 (IR: 0.56)
Impact Ratio: 0.56
Critical intersectional impact for Asian × 35-44 (IR: 0.48)
Impact Ratio: 0.48
Critical intersectional impact for Other × 35-44 (IR: 0.48)
Impact Ratio: 0.48
Critical intersectional impact for Hispanic or Latino × 45-54 (IR: 0.48)
Impact Ratio: 0.48
Critical intersectional impact for Hispanic or Latino × 35-44 (IR: 0.45)
Impact Ratio: 0.45
Critical intersectional impact for Asian × 25-34 (IR: 0.42)
Impact Ratio: 0.42
Critical intersectional impact for White × 35-44 (IR: 0.24)
Impact Ratio: 0.24
Critical intersectional impact for Black or African American × 25-34 (IR: 0.21)
Impact Ratio: 0.21
Critical intersectional impact for Hispanic or Latino × 18-24 (IR: 0.17)
Impact Ratio: 0.17
Critical intersectional impact for White × 18-24 (IR: 0.17)
Impact Ratio: 0.17
Critical intersectional impact for Black or African American × 35-44 (IR: 0.14)
Impact Ratio: 0.14
Critical intersectional impact for Hispanic or Latino × 55+ (IR: 0.13)
Impact Ratio: 0.13
Critical intersectional impact for Hispanic or Latino × 25-34 (IR: 0.11)
Impact Ratio: 0.11
Critical intersectional impact for Other × 55+ (IR: 0.00)
Impact Ratio: 0.00
Critical intersectional impact for Other × 18-24 (IR: 0.00)
Impact Ratio: 0.00
Critical intersectional impact for Black or African American × 55+ (IR: 0.00)
Impact Ratio: 0.00
Adverse impact detected for age_range at hired stage (IR: 0.79)
Impact Ratio: 0.79
Intersectional adverse impact for Male × Asian (IR: 0.70)
Impact Ratio: 0.70
Intersectional adverse impact for Female × Other (IR: 0.64)
Impact Ratio: 0.64
Intersectional adverse impact for Non-binary × 45-54 (IR: 0.67)
Impact Ratio: 0.67
Intersectional adverse impact for Male × 45-54 (IR: 0.64)
Impact Ratio: 0.64
Intersectional adverse impact for White × 25-34 (IR: 0.74)
Impact Ratio: 0.74
Intersectional adverse impact for Asian × 55+ (IR: 0.67)
Impact Ratio: 0.67
Intersectional adverse impact for White × 45-54 (IR: 0.63)
Impact Ratio: 0.63
Potential concern for gender at hired stage (IR: 0.82)
Potential concern for ethnicity at hired stage (IR: 0.80)
Impact ratios below 0.8 indicate potential adverse impact under the 4/5ths rule.
| Category | Stage | Reference Group | Impact Ratio | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| gender | screening | Male | 1.00 | Pass |
| gender | hired | Non-binary | 0.82 | Warning |
| gender | interview | Male | 1.00 | Pass |
| gender | offer | Male | 1.00 | Pass |
| ethnicity | screening | Hispanic or Latino | 1.00 | Pass |
| ethnicity | hired | Hispanic or Latino | 0.80 | Warning |
| ethnicity | interview | Other | 1.00 | Pass |
| ethnicity | offer | Black or African American | 1.00 | Pass |
| age range | screening | 18-24 | 1.00 | Pass |
| age range | hired | 45-54 | 0.79 | Adverse Impact |
| age range | interview | 45-54 | 1.00 | Pass |
| age range | offer | 35-44 | 1.00 | Pass |
Confidence levels indicate the statistical reliability of the analysis.
gender
high
ethnicity
high
age range
high
Get detailed bias detection, compliance reporting, and actionable recommendations for your organization.